Six reasons Ron Paul appeals to young voters


Since starting this blog nine days ago, I’ve twice noted the popularity that Ron Paul enjoys among young voters.  I haven’t yet offered an explanation for his success, but others have.  To my knowledge, the most recent of these explanations comes from Alex Pearlman writing at Policymic and The Next Great Generation.

Pearlman’s article doesn’t come to any strong conclusion — Pearlman offers her own three scattered reasons (Paul’s different; he’s the “least evil”; and he speaks to youth issues) in addition to four distinct suggestions from outsiders.  It’s a good effort at a hard task.  To get at the real reasons, you’d first have to round up a random group of young Paul supporters, then you’d have to sit them down long enough for focus groups and surveys (I imagine Paul supporters as overly-excitable and opposed to labels, so it would be hard to do this).  Then you’d have to deal with the differences between what young Paul supporters say draws them to Paul versus what actually did attract them.

Nonetheless, Pearlman’s article got me thinking about the subject, and I figured I’d have a crack at six reasons why Paul appeals to many young voters:

Paul is a rebel.  According to some social science literature, young people are more apt to be rebels who enjoy swimming against the stream of society (crime, for instance, is more commonly committed by young people).  Ron Paul is perfect for these young contrarians — he bucks the establishment by suggesting ideas such as “The FED should be eliminated” or “The War on Drugs should be ended” that are outside or opposite the political mainstream.  In this sense, Ron Paul is the tattoo or nose piercing for the nerdy political junkies that never seriously rebelled.

email

V2A tagged this post with:
, , ,
Read 549 articles by
  • Aniko

    Well, young voters voted for Obama the last time around, so that is NOT and should NOT be a litmus test. Young people are also notorious for not showing up at the voting booth even if they love to carry signs and yell louder than older people. Just listen at the debates where you can hear that the number is small but loud!

    My opinion that young people are attracted to Ron Paul is that young people are naive and inexperienced in life so something kooky sounds grrreat to them. Also with the disintegration of families, they have a yearning for grandfathers and this one is radical enough for their liking.

  • Riverdweller

    Dr: Maybe the young adults have little appreciation for history because they are not TAUGHT HISTORY.
    I recently saw the short film 180 U-turn. Basically it's purpose is to change minds about abortion, however abortion was compared to HITLER and the Holocaust.. Roughly about 9 out 10 persons did NOT KNOW who Hitler was!!
    Also there is another film AGENDA – on how to destroy America.In it was a shot of a paper with the name ROSENBERG in large letters (I instantly remembered them)
    . I don't know how old you are but do you remember them or have you heard of them?
    My church showed only a few minutes of it as it was being shown later that night at the local theater free of charge. I asked several people after the clip if they knew of or heard about the Rosenbergs. One woman who is older than I am by about 8 or 10 years was the only one who remembered them or had heard of them.
    They are NOT TAUGHT about it in history classes these days and neither, it seems, is Hitler.

  • Joyce

    Ron Paul is in utopia/never never land. He would make, at best, 3/4 of a good president. We wouldn't survive long enough to institude his excellent ideas.

  • slide & glide

    Ron Paul is 76 years old. He would be 77 before he would become President next January. That would make him 81 in 4 years, at the end of his 1st term. Do we really want someone that old? He is senile already.

  • Robert, TX

    This election is slowly becoming a decision between: do you want a black guy to hand you your government check? If so, vote Obama. Or, do you want a white guy to hand you your government check? If so, vote Romney (or whichever RINO they throw up there). Do you want to actually CUT spending and return to the Constitution? Then vote for Ron Paul.

  • Chauck

    Ron Paul is a Libertarian. Hi does not believe in government, or boundaries, or a large military.

  • Joyce

    You are correct Chauck! Ron Paul is a Libertarian, not a conservative or a Republian. The "honorable"? Ron Paul is USING the Republican Party to advertise himself. If he thinks he has a small chance to win, he will shed the Republican Party like a dirty shirt, without a thank you or a look back. He is a user!. Ron Paul has some excellent ideas but would be disaster as a President.

  • Bud MacGuire

    Ron Paul is the last chance America will have to avert the oncomming disaster of bankruptsy. Ron Paul is the only candidate for president who has a plan for saving America from bankruptsy. THE ONLY ONE.

  • KnowTheTruthToday

    Ron obviously is a dope taker from the 60s. He may be a nice guy now, but before he could take you from where we are now to where he wants to be, there would be no country left.

  • SEAN MURRY

    Paul is too old for the job and has no experice.

  • arlingotn vet

    I read a lot of generalities in all of these responses, but do any of you know how exactly Ron Paul voted and how Newt voted while in congress. I am undecided and would like to be enlightened.
    I'm an old coot also and I am beginning to think that having a joint should be legal and taxed to finance the war on dangerous drugs IMHO.

    • Riverdweller

      Google Ron Paul. You will get a lot of results. His voting record should be there among them all. He votes against any bill that is not Constitutional. He is totally pro-life and delivered over 4000 babies – some free of charge to poor parents. He gives back some of his Congressional salary every year. He has stated if he is POTUS he would take only $39,000.00 and a bit more as salary, about average for Americans these days. He would not accept the over $400,000.00 per year that is currently the POTUS salary.

  • eva

    Anyone who takes seriously the political opinions of college students, especially those of today's world, is an idiot. What do they know of life, have they tried to work and support a family, etc? Especially today, they are spoiled and ignorant brats, with a dumbed- down (read: brainwashed) education. Why the heck does anyone care about their so-called opinions?? I just don't get it,

  • DebraD

    Where is the rest of this article? I’d like to see what the other reasons are.

  • Richard

    Libertarians are fiscal conservatives and a social liberals. Social liberty is license to do whatever turns you on or not do whatever turns you off. This is utopian idealism. It is refusing accountability. Only a fool closes his eyes to the screaming evidence of intelligent design. If there is a creator God of the universe and all that is in it then there is an absolute lawmaker. If God makes laws of physics so that there is predictable order in the universe, then there logically follows laws of behavior for living things, including man who was appointed steward of all creation. God published rules of right living so we'd know how to do our job, caring for each other and the earth. Young people and old hippies (liberals) don't want liberty because liberty has a price — moral absolutes are necessary for everyone to live in peace and freedom. Notice that liberals and libertarians don't do sacrifice. Don't put your morality on me and I won't bother you. But that degenerates into anarchy which leads to tyranny to restore order; otherwise every store and home in the land will be looted. So while libertarians pretend to be true conservatives they are only conservatives without a conscience,